Featured Articles...

Showing posts with label CRISIL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CRISIL. Show all posts

December 16, 2013

CERC's new tariff norms to hit profitability of power utilities: CRISIL

 

CERC's new tariff norms to hit profitability of power utilities: CRISIL

The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission’s draft tariff guidelines for power utilities applicable for 2014-2019 have potential to reduce aggregate annual profits of CRISIL-rated utilities by Rs 1,400 crore, or nearly 7 per cent of their profits in the last fiscal.

The rating agency CRISIL, however, believes that the guidelines will not impact the credit risk profiles of these utilities.

According to Pawan Agrawal, Senior Director, CRISIL Ratings, “The guidelines retain the crucial feature of availability-based fixed-cost recovery, which covers debt servicing for these utilities. This will help them maintain stability in cash flows, and therefore, in credit quality.” This covers 13 CRISIL-rated power utilities which come under the purview of CERC.

The draft guidelines stipulate a change in the manner of reimbursement of tax, a stringent incentive structure and stricter operating parameters for utilities. The adverse impact of these provisions is only marginally offset by benefits such as higher escalation rate for operating and maintenance expenses and increase in late-payment charges.

The most important stipulation in the draft guidelines is the change in reimbursement of expense on tax relating to return on equity, which will now be linked to actual tax outflow, rather than the applicable statutory tax rates as in the existing guidelines. The guidelines propose that for generation companies, the incentive be calculated on plant load factor, rather than on plant availability factor as in the current norms.

Generators will now have to share a fourth of their incentives with beneficiaries. For transmission companies, the threshold for availing of incentives has been enhanced.

Agrawal said, “These provisions will reduce the power utilities’ profits from existing as well as under-implementation projects. Specifically for generators, the shift to a PLF-linked incentive structure can result in significant loss of incentive income, given the fuel availability challenges faced by the sector.”

The draft regulations also propose stricter operating parameters such as station heat rate and secondary fuel consumption. This will primarily impact the older plants, which may find it difficult to meet the proposed parameters.

Source

Read More...

May 8, 2012

Discom losses reached to the level 2 lakh Crores… High need of strong reforms…

Power India found that according to the recent insights published by CRISIL, the losses of power distribution companies have crosses Rs. 2 Lacs Crores at end of March 2012 due to lower tariffs and higher fuel costs.

As outlined by the Report to primary reasons for the decreased bottom lines of Discoms are inadequate increase in tariffs of the power and inefficient harnessing of fuels such as coal, gas etc.

Issues relating to Tariff Side
  • Over the second half of the previous decade, power tariffs in India grew by under 5% p.a.
  • Against this, per capita income grew by 13.4% p.a. while household expenditure grew at 10.6% p.a.
  • Consequently, the share of energy expenses in Indian households declined for the first time in two decades, during this period.
  • Power tariffs have also lagged inflation.
  • As said by MD and CEO of CRUSIL, Roopa Kudva, Managing Director and CEO, CRISIL,
“This indicates that Indian consumers can bear higher tariffs, and policy makers may have more flexibility to increase tariffs than they are currently exercising. Had power tariffs been hiked to keep pace with other household expenses, power utilities would have earned additional revenue of about Rs.950 billion in this period. Instead of making aggregate losses of Rs.870 billion, they would have made an aggregate profit of Rs. 80 billion.

Issues relating to Fuel Costs
  • Indian coal production has remained stagnant in the last 4 years at 400-440 million MT.
  • The power sector’s reliance on more expensive imported coal therefore doubled from 7% of coal-based power generation in FY 2007 to 15% in FY 2012.
  • Imported coal is priced at 1.6 times domestic coal and typical transportation cost for imported coal is 1.5 times that for domestic coal.

Suggested Reforms
  • The key reform would be to devise a mechanism to enable an automatic pass through of fuel price increases to power tariffs.
  • The problem of delays in payment of subsidies by state governments to utilities can be addressed by setting up an appropriate escrow mechanism operated by the Reserve Bank of India to ensure timely subsidy payments.
  • Utilities must be required to disclose their circle-wise technical and commercial losses along with the improvement targets for each circle.
  • Further, we must effectively harness our coal reserves by formulating mining policies that incentivise timely development and production by mine licensees.


More Literature on this topic:




--------------------------
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons license.
Read More...