Featured Articles...

Showing posts with label MSEDCL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MSEDCL. Show all posts

January 20, 2014

Maharashtra slashes power tariff by 20 per cent…

 

Maharashtra slashes power tariff by 20 per cent…

In a major pre-election initiative, the Maharashtra government on Monday slashed power tariff by 20 per cent across all sectors.

The move will provide relief to domestic, commercial, industrial and agricultural consumers, according to an announcement by the Chief Minister's Office.

The 20 per cent cut will be applicable for domestic consumers - around 1.30 crore in the state - using up to 300 units per month.

The move drew criticism from the Shiv Sena and the Bharatiya Janata Party.

The decision will be implemented in the entire state including north-east parts of Mumbai which get power from the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB).

"A decision on the other areas of the city - like north-west and south Mumbai - which are serviced by private suppliers like Tata Power and Reliance Energy shall be taken next week," an official said.

The MSEB has a total of 2.14 crore consumers in Maharashtra, of which 1.56 crore are domestic users, a MSEB spokesperson said.

Of these 1.56 crore, a whopping 1.30 crore fall in the below 300-units per month range, making them eligible for the 20 percent slashed tariff.

Maharashtra also has 3.60 million agriculture consumers, 1.60 million commercial users, 300,000 industrial and 100,000 powerlooms.

Certain other consumers like the railways are no included in the above list, the spokesperson said.

The 20 per cent reduction in tariff would mean a loss of around Rs.706 crore per month for MSEB.

However, the government will provide subsidy of Rs.606 crore per month or Rs.7,272 crore per annum to the MSEB.

The remaining Rs.100 crore per month or Rs.1,200 crore per annum will be borne by the MSEB.

Since the past fortnight, Congress MP Sanjay Nirupam has launched protests demanding reduction in power tariff in Mumbai and other parts in the interest of ordinary consumers.

Source

Read More...

January 8, 2014

Mahadiscom sitting on Rs 1,000 crore Dabhol bill...

 

Mahadiscom sitting on Rs 1,000 crore Dabhol bill...

Fuel shortage is not the only problem the Dabhol power project is faced with. It turns out that one of its shareholders and beneficiaries, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company (Mahadiscom), is also partly responsible for the project's financial woes.

In a letter to power secretary P K Sinha, IDBI Bank chairman M S Raghavan has said the state government's discom has failed to pay Rs 1,003 crore to Dabhol, making it difficult for lenders to keep the project's loan account out of the list of bad debts.

Mahadiscom is Maharashtra government's distribution arm. The state government, through MSEB Holding Company, owns over 17% in Ratnagiri Gas and Power Private, the joint venture with state-run utilities NTPC and GAIL that owns the project.

"While the company is facing serious liquidity problems owing to stoppage of gas supply from RIL (Reliance Industries), the delay in release of payments by MSEDCL (Mahadiscom) has further strained the cash flow position of the company (Dabhol)," Raghavan has said.

According to Madhavan, The discom owes Dabhol Rs 497 crore for power purchased from the project during the April-July 2013 period and another Rs 506 crore towards recovery of 'fixed charges' for the capacity declared available on the basis of using imported liquid gas as fuel.

 

Sources said the discom made a payment of Rs 50 crore against its outstanding on December 30 after Madhavan wrote to Sinha. But bankers described this as too little too late.

No wonder then that Dabhol has been defaulting in servicing its debt since October 2013. It ran up overdues of banks and institutions of around Rs 331 crore. It is reported to have made a minimum payment of Rs 167 crore by December 31 to avert being tagged as a non-performing asset. But going by Madhavan's letter, it may be only a temporary reprieve and saving Dabhol from being declared as an NPA would solely depend on Mahadiscom clearing its dues regularly.

As TOI first reported on October 7 last year, ICICI Bank managing director Chanda Kochhar first sounded alarm bells over loan default by Dabhol and its devastating impact on the banking sector that has an exposure of Rs 8,500 crore to the project.

The project's problems started in October when gas flow stopped completely under the government's policy decision forced by a sharp fall in output from RIL's KG-D-6 field. The government was forced to divert the available gas away from power plants from RIL's field to fertilizer plants.

Mahadiscom rejected Dabhol's proposal to run the plant on costlier imported liquid gas on the ground it would push up the power tariff beyond acceptable levels. As a result, the company is struggling to recover even the fixed costs on its capacity.

Dabhol is one of the showcase business rescue missions the Centre carried out by taking over the mothballed plants and an adjacent gas shipping port after US energy major Enron went bust in 2001.

Source

Read More...

Maharashtra Cabinet meets today to decide on reducing power tariffs...

 

Maharashtra Cabinet meets today to decide on reducing power tariffs...

Maharashtra cabinet led by Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan is scheduled to meet on Wednesday to decide on reducing the existing power tariffs for residential, commercial and industrial consumers across the state.

Today's cabinet meets comes in the wake of demands made by AICC secretary and MP Sanjay Nirupam that Maharashtra government should also reduce tariff for power consumption of less than 500 units per month in the city.

The Congress MP demanded a cut in power tarrif apparently taking cue from Delhi government's decision of 50 percent cut in power tariff.

In a letter to Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan, the Mumbai North Lok Sabha MP said power tariff should be substantially reduced for those whose consumption is less than 500 units per month.

The Congress MP said if the legitimate expectation of the entire middle class and slum population is not met in the immediate future, he will launch an agitation against the government.

Nirupam also demanded that an inquiry be set up to investigate the cost structure and pricing mechanism adopted by power distribution companies.

He said the Delhi government's decision will benefit the middle class and slum dwellers.

Reacting to Nirupam's demand, the Chief Minister said, “The state has to think on the extent of relief it can give to consumers."

However, Chavan indicated that the government is thinking about the quantum of relief and had more or less made up its mind to go ahead with the plan.

A decision might be taken in about a fortnight, some state government officials also said.

In today's meting, the cabinet is expected to discus sops for electricity consumers in the state and possible ways to reduce tariffs in Mumbai and other areas.

Media reports said that the Maharashtra government would need Rs 1,600 crore to reduce power bills by 50% for those consuming less than 400 units a month in Mumbai (the model that the AAP government in Delhi has decided to implement).

State cabinet sources said the Narayan Rane committee had already given positive recommendations in this regard and suggested a range of subsidies that could vary between Rs 2,000 crore and Rs 8,000 crore.

Though Mumbai was not in the scope of the Rane committee's report, the city's scenario too was discussed at length and it was decided to come out with some sops for Mumbai consumers too.

Source

Read More...

January 4, 2014

After Delhi, MH to reduce electricity tariff by 15 per cent for MSEDCL consumers...

 

After Delhi, MH to reduce electricity tariff by 15 per cent for MSEDCL consumers...

Nearly 21.4 million consumers of the state-run Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company (MahaVitaran) can expect a gift in the New Year, which happens to be an election year, too.

A Cabinet sub-committee headed by Maharashtra Industries Minister Narayan Rane has recommended an across-the-board 15 per cent reduction in existing rates. The committee has also recommended reduction in the electricity duty.

Power rate in Maharashtra is 20-50 per cent higher than other states. The panel has not considered any cut in the rate charged to Mumbai consumers by Tata Power, Reliance Infrastructure, MahaVitaran and BrihanMumbai Electric Supply & Transport (BEST).

If the recommendation is implemented, the state government and MahaVitaran will have to bear a burden of about Rs 2,000 crore annually. Of this, MahaVitaran’s share will be at least Rs 200 crore, while the state government will have to provide the balance through a budgetary allocation.

This will be in addition to the annual subsidy of Rs 10,500 crore provided to agricultural consumers and Rs 1,100 crore to power looms. Of this, MahaVitaran cross-subsidises industry and commercial consumers worth Rs 6,500 crore; the balance is contributed by the state government.

According to the rates effective from September, high-tension industrial consumer power rate ranges between Rs 10.51 and Rs 11.53 a unit; for high-tension commercial consumers, it is between Rs 9.46 and Rs 14.46 a unit. For low-tension industries, it is between Rs 8.07  and Rs 10.06 a unit. For high-tension agricultural consumers, the per unit tariff is Rs 3.83.

A senior minister who was part of the committee told Business Standard: “The Rane committee, which was formed in October to address issues raised by couple of parties and organisations, submitted its report on Thursday evening to the state government. The decision will be taken after the approval of state Cabinet at its meeting slated for next week.”

The minister claimed the state government’s decision has nothing to do with Aam Aadmi Party's move to cut 50 per cent tariff for those consuming below of 400 units of electricity in Delhi.

Source: Business Standard

Read More...

December 23, 2013

MERC against competitive bidding in wind power purchase by state Discoms...

 

MERC against competitive bidding in wind power purchase by state Discoms...

Even as MSEDCL is facing allegations of irregularities in power purchase, Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC) has turned down a plea in which MSEDCL was seeking transparency.

MSEDCL wanted to purchase wind power through competitive bidding, but the Commission wants MSEDCL to buy it at rates fixed by it. MSEDCL filed a petition in MERC seeking a review. The Commission agreed that it was a valid point, but referred the matter to a committee headed by principal secretary (energy), with representatives of wind power companies, Maharashtra Energy Development Agency (MEDA) and consumers representatives. Incidentally, principal secretary (energy) Ajoy Mehta is also managing director of MSEDCL.

The committee was constituted on October 1 to study wind energy situation in the state and was asked to submit its report in three months. The Commission has refused to grant interim relief to MSEDCL in the meantime.

Mahagenco and MSEDCL had accused the Commission of favouring wind power producers. They charged that the rates of wind power approved by it are the highest in the country, but the rates of solar power, whose sole generator is Mahagenco, are one of the lowest. However, the Indian Wind Power Association (IWPA) submitted data to MERC proving MSEDCL wrong.

MERC's rate for wind power ranges from Rs 4.93 to Rs 5.67 per unit, which is far higher than thermal power rates (except new units of Mahagenco). MSEDCL has resolutely opposed purchase of wind power on the grounds that it will burden consumers, but MERC has not refused to buy this agreement. Now, MSEDCL wants competition to lower the rates.

During the hearing, MSEDCL submitted that the rates of solar power have come down due to competition, and the same would happen in wind also. It pointed out that Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003, did not make any segregation in purchase of renewable energy and non-renewable energy.

While agreeing that wind power was costly, MERC told MSEDCL that it had to meet renewable energy purchase obligation (RPO) target set by central government. The company had failed to meet its target in 2012-13 even though the entire contracted capacity of 2,350MW had been commissioned.

MERC has also turned down MSEDCL's plea for a uniform wind power tariff in the state. The Commission has divided the state into two zones for calculating the rates. It is Rs 4.93 per unit in one zone and Rs 5.67 per unit in the other. The Commission said in the order that zoning was done after taking views of all concerned parties and as per norms of renewable energy tariff regulations. Therefore, any revision was not desirable, it said.

Source

Read More...

December 20, 2013

Maharashtra Government to reduce power tariff for Vidarbha Industries...

 

Maharashtra Government to reduce power tariff for Vidarbha Industries...

In a big relief to the Vidarbha industries, the Maharashtra government, on Thursday, declared that it would reduce the recently increased power tariff for the industries on an urgent basis.

Industries minister Narayan Rane made the announcement in the assembly while replying to a calling attention motion move by MLA Devendra Fadnavis highlighting various problems faced by industries in Butibori and Hingna areas.

The minister assured the house to conduct an 'industry friend' meeting in the city, instead of Mumbai, to boost the local establishments and also to attract new investments. He also assured to take positive steps on reducing water charges for the industries.

Source

Read More...

December 19, 2013

Maharashtra may lower industrial power tariff...

 

image

Industries in states reeling under high power tariffs may be in for some relief. Fear of losing investment to neighbouring states that have lower tariff might result in state lowering its tariff to competitive levels.

The government will soon decide on the demand of matching the power tariff for industrial belts in the state with those in Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh. The assurance came from revenue minister Narayan Rane during the discussion over the calling attention motion moved by leader of opposition Eknath Khadse in the legislative assembly.

Khadse pointed out that over 500 small and big industrial units in Tarapur in Thane and a few surrounding areas had either downed their shutters or shifted base to neighbouring Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh due to more efficient and cheaper power there. He said recently the state had cut power supply to around 100 units in Tarapur MIDC citing they had breached pollution rules. This, Khadse said, not only led to unemployment in the state but also resulted in industries shifting to other states. According to him, power tariffs in other states were much lower compared to those in Maharashtra.

Rane said within a few days the government would decide on matching the power tariffs with those in other states pointing out that his ministry had already initiated Rs 3000 crore programme to rebuild basic amenities in industrial pockets of the state.

Later, addressing local businessmen at Vidarbha Industries Association (VIA), the minister said a committee had been formed to review the tariffs and a decision could be expected by Friday. "I agree high power tariffs have been bothering the industries and the issue will be addressed." Later he told TOI that review of power tariffs for all categories of consumers was being considered and not just for industries alone. This includes agriculture and even domestic power users. He hinted that most probably the latest hike of Rs 1.60 per unit would be revised.

The minster was reluctant to look into other demands such as reducing the rates charged for land in the MIDC's estates on the grounds that the government needed funds to set up infrastructure. "In Vidarbha alone tenders for setting up industrial infrastructure to the tune of Rs 470 crore had been floated," he said.

Members of the Butibori Manufacturers Association (BMA) demanded a six month breather from action to take back vacant plots in the estate. BMA vice president Puneet Mahajan said many entrepreneurs could not set up the factories due to recession and needed six months to fulfill the conditions. Rane agreed to look into it though MIDC's CEO Bhushan Gagrani expressed reluctance.

Source

Read More...

December 18, 2013

MH Govt nod to Rs 80cr for Kolhapur's underground power cables...

 

MH Govt nod to Rs 80cr for Kolhapur's underground power cables...

The Maharashtra State government has sanctioned Rs 80 crore for the Kolhapur city to have underground electricity cables for the first time. The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) will lay a wide underground network of high- and low-tension wires through the city with the funds.

Dipak Kumthekar, superintendent engineer of the Kolhapur district, MSEDCL, told TOI on Tuesday, "The funds have been sanctioned to Kolhapur city, but the tender procedure has not yet been initiated. We are expecting it to be completed by April 2014. Apart from aesthetics, the cables are more secure, tamper proof and have a longer life."

The decision was taken to cater to the growing demand and expansion of the city, as it is not easy to erect electricity polls in the city.

Kumthekar said that the company had found it difficult several times to find appropriate location to set up a poll due to the opposition from locals or inconvenient approach routes. Sometimes, there are technical issues as well, he said.

The funds will be used to lay 88-km long underground high tension cables and 112-km long low tension cables in the city. In addition to this, 71-km long elevated high tension cable will also be laid, which will supply power to various substations. The city will also have 230 new substations to meet the growing demand of the city, Kumthekar said.

Data from the Kolhapur Municipal Corporation reveals that at least 1,000 building construction proposals are sanctioned every year, which is directly linked with the rise in power consumers. Spaces in the city are also allotted for commercial, business or service purposes, which require more electricity supply. To meet the growing demand for power, the MSEDCL has decided to set up more transformers and high tension cables.

Source

Read More...

December 16, 2013

NSL Power to invest $45 mn to set up Windfarms in Maharashtra...

 

NSL Power to invest $45 mn to set up Windfarms in Maharashtra...

NSL Power, which plans to invest $45 million to set up new wind farms in Maharashtra, is planning to raise around $15.75 million from the International Finance Corporation.

NSL Renewable Power Private Limited is the ‘Sponsor’ for Jath Wind Energy Private Limited. IFC is an equity holder in the Sponsor, holding 7.9% on a fully diluted basis.

According to company's project disclosure, NSL Power is planning to set up a 40MW wind power plant in Vaspet, Sangli District of Maharashtra through an SPV called Jath Wind Energy Private Limited. The project company has been setup for the sole purpose of construction, operation, and maintenance of the 40 MW project and will not have any other operations.

The Project is expected to be commissioned by March 31, 2014. The off-taker will be Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd (MSEDCL), a state owned utility.

INOX Wind Limited (INOX), a wind turbine manufacturer and project developer (and a group company of an IFC investee company Inox Renewables Ltd), will be developing the project on a turnkey basis – from design to construction to commissioning, which includes the micrositing, land acquisition, obtaining statutory approvals, WTG supply, and EPC and O&M.

Investment in the project is estimated at about $45 million equivalent and the proposed IFC investment consists of an IFC ‘A’ Loan of up to $ 15.75 million equivalent subject to a cap of 35% of the total project cost.

The balance debt financing of up to $15.75 million equivalent is proposed to be arranged from other Indian lenders by the Sponsor or through the IFC syndicated loan products.

Source

Read More...

December 5, 2013

Maharashtra sets up panel on tariff revision for adani owned Tiroda plant...

 

Maharashtra sets up panel on tariff revision for adani owned Tiroda plant...

The Maharashtra cabinet on 04-12-2013 cleared a proposal to appoint a committee to decide on a tariff revision for Adani Power Ltd's 1,320 MW Tiroda power plant in Gondia district, as directed by the Maharashtra State Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC).

The state government-owned power distribution utility Mahavitaran Ltd had signed a power-purchase agreement (PPA) with Adani Power in 2008. However, in 2009, the environment ministry declined to grant clearance to a captive coal mine allotted to the company as the mine was in the middle of the buffer zone at Tadoba tiger reserve.

Subsequently, it tried to negotiate with Mahavitaran for a higher tariff as it had to purchase coal from other sources, but Mahavitaran declined to oblige.
Adani Power approached MERC seeking a tariff revision in 2011. In August, ruling in favour of Adani Power, MERC approved a temporary hike of 57 paisa per unit and asked the state government to appoint a committee to decide on the tariff hike.
"The committee will consist of secretary energy, managing director of Mahavitaran, independent financial analysts, bankers and independent experts from power sector," a press release issued by the chief minister's office said.

The government has already approved an increase in price of power purchased from Mundhra ultra mega power project (UMPP) by 59 paise per unit, which has taken the price to Rs2.85 per unit. In this case too coal price hike caused generation cost to move up. MSEDCL gets 800MW from this plant.

The increased cost of power purchase will be recovered from consumers through fuel surcharge that appears in your bill as 'Indhan Adhibhar'.

Adani Power had filed a petition in Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC) demanding increase in power rates as the allocation of Lohara coal mine had been cancelled by ministry of environment and forests (MoEF) and it was forced to buy coal from elsewhere and price of this coal was far higher.

MERC agreed to Adani's contentions and asked the state government to set up a committee to revise the rates on lines of Tata Power's Mundhra UMPP. Other than ACS (planning) it will comprise principal secretary (energy), managing director of MSEDCL and experts in the sectors of finance and power.

While the price of Adani power is expected to cross Rs3 per unit, Mundhra's 800MW still remains one of the cheapest for MSEDCL. Other private companies are supplying it at over Rs3 per unit while its rate of the new units of its sister concern Mahagenco is over Rs4 per unit.

The decision to increase Mundhra's rates was taken on the recommendation of Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC). The state government agreed to the hike with certain conditions. Tata would have to make advance payments to Indonesian coal suppliers with the profit earned. The financial institutions that have provided loan to the company should reduce their rates. Similarly, the power generated over and above 80% plant load factor (PLF) should be supplied to MSEDCL.

Meanwhile, the government has decided to provide grants to MSEDCL for providing electric connections to poor SC and ST consumers instead of loans. This will reduce financial burden on the company and consequently the tariff. The loans given since 2010-11 will be converted into grants. Money will be made available from district planning committee (DPC) funds as earlier.

Source: ToI & KSEBOA

Read More...

November 20, 2013

MahaVitaran can scrap Mundra project PPA citing unviability...

 

image

Maharashtra cabinet on Wednesday gave its approval to the state-run Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company (MahaVitaran) to repudiate its power purchase agreement (PPA) with Coastal Gujarat Power Ltd (CGPL), an arm of Tata Power if the power drawal from Mundra ultra mega power project (UMPP) becomes unviable at any point of time. The repudiation will be  done without any compensation to CGPL.
 
The MahaVitaran can explore this option after the Mundra UMPP tariff is revised following the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission's (CERC) approval to the compensatory tariff as suggested by the Deepak Parikh Committee. It has  recommended compensatory tariff of 56 paise per unit. The tariff will be adjusted for profits that Tata Power earns from its coal mines in Indonesia.
 
State cabinet also cleared MahaVitaran's plea allowing it to file its affidavit before CERC which is currently hearing the case in this regard. The cabinet asked MahaVitaran to strongly put up its case before CERC even renegotiate its PPA before resorting to the repudiation on the grounds of unviability.
 
A senior minister told Business Standard ''If the tariff becomes unviable, Maha Vitaran can repudiate its 25 year long PPA with CGPL for the purchase of 800 MW. MahaVitaran today informed the cabient that it will have to bear an additional burden of Rs 300 crore annually if the compensatory tariff of 56 paise is accepted."
 
As reported by BS in October, MahaVitaran has argued that CGPL should cut the return on equity (ROE) in a bid to give relief ultimately to its consumers.  ''CGPL is earning a ROE  of 35 paise a unit. Besides, MahaVitaran wants that the lenders of CGPL should also agree to reducing the interest rate and that the relief be passed on to procurers,'' the minister informed.

Source

Read More...

November 19, 2013

Cross-subsidy surcharge in open access to rise in Maharashtra...

 

Cross Subsidy Surcharge in Maharashtra

Industries in Maharashtra will have to shell out more to avail open access due to a rise in cross-subsidy surcharge (CSS). The trigger is a recent order by the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC) to increase CSS from September 1 this year with retrospective effect.

Industry bodies argue open access will become an unviable proposition because, apart from higher CSS, they will have to pay charges towards transmission and distribution losses, wheeling charges and administrative charges. This will amount to more than Rs 3.60 per unit over and above the purchase of power through open access.

For extra high voltage (EHV) express feeder consumers, CSS in open access has increased from Rs 1.63 a unit to Rs 2.75 a unit; for EHV non-express feeder consumers, it has risen from Rs 1.20 a unit to Rs 2.26 a unit. In the case of high-tension express feeder consumers, CSS has increased to Rs 2.30 a unit from Rs 1.18 and for high-tension non-express feeder consumers, it has risen from 76 paise a unit to 1.82 a unit.

Jayant Deo, founder member of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, told Business Standard: "'The increase in CSS is against the Electricity Act, 2003 and also the National Tariff Policy. In fact, as per the third proviso of section 42 (2) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the surcharge and cross-subsidies are required to be progressively reduced in the manner as may be specified by the regulator. However, in this case, MERC has not given the roadmap for the same. MERC’s order is against the very preamble of the Electricity Act, 2003 which demands transparency in the subsidies."

On the other hand, R B Goenka, chairman of Vidarbha Industries Association's (VIA) Energy Cell, said there won't be any competition in the power sector and the consumers drawing power from the state-run Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company will have no other option to purchase power from it despite high tariff. "In our view, the CSS is unrealistic and misplaced. CSS in open access cannot be increased till a road map for reduction in cross-subsidy is decided,'' he added. According to Goenka, VIA will soon approach the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity challenging the MERC's order.

According to S L Patil, advisor, Thane Belapur Industries Association, industries will not be able to avail cheap power from various sources in the country. Higher CCS, as proposed, will kill the spirit of competitiveness in the power sector and is detrimental to industrial growth, which is already struggling with the high cost of inputs, he noted.

Source

Read More...

November 17, 2013

MSEDCL blames MERC, activists for high electricity tariff...

 

image

Under attack from all quarters over high power tariff in the state, MSEDCL officials have blamed consumer activists and Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC) for the recent steep tariff hike. Senior officials also ask that why these activists don't evaluate the performance of private companies like Tata Power and Reliance.

"MSEDCL had to recover some dues from consumers from 2009-10 onwards. However, MERC did not allow us to do so until this September. Naturally, when an accumulated account is to be recovered in six months, the surcharge will be higher," a senior official said.

The official further said that MSEDCL had done a lot of capital expenditure in the last two years to improve the power infrastructure. "We have to recover this cost from consumers. Under pressure from consumer activists, MERC did not allow us to recover it on time. Now it has told us to recover expenses of two years in six months," he told TOI.

Another official launched a direct attack on the consumer activists. "The rates approved by MERC for wind energy are the highest in the country. MERC is promoting wind energy suo motu. Why have these activists never raised this issue? MSEDCL had repeatedly told the Commission that this costly power would only burden common consumers," he said.

The official further said that MERC's consumer representatives never targeted Reliance for its high industrial power tariff. "Reliance does not have agricultural consumers. Still its tariff is Rs 9.12 per unit while that of MSEDCL is Rs 8.22 per unit and that too for six months. They were also silent during the Tata Power asset valuation controversy. Why do they target only government companies," he asked.

MSEDCL has also contended that while comparing its power tariff with that of Gujarat, the consumer activists forget that subsidy to powerlooms in Gujarat is very low. "The consumer activists want low cross subsidy for industries, low tariff for farmers and powerlooms and other consumers. We don't have a magic wand. If industrial tariff reduces, that of others will increase. Open access will hit poor and middle class consumers. This is the harsh reality and consumer activists must accept it," he stressed.

Source

Read More...

November 16, 2013

Industry users unite against high power tariff in Maharashtra...

 

Power Tariff Increase in Maharashtra

High-tension industry consumers in Maharashtra with a monthly consumption of 100,000 units are up in arms against the high power tariff in the state. Industry bodies have argued that tariff charged by state-run Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company (MahaVitaran) is higher by Rs 2 to 2.50 per unit compared to other states.

As per the latest statistics available with the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, Maharashtra tops the list with the per unit tariff of Rs 8.82 followed by Delhi (Rs 6.64),Tamil Nadu (Rs 6.04), Jharkhand (Rs 5.82), Karnataka (Rs 5.56), Chhattisgarh (Rs 5.46), Odisha (Rs 4.95).

Of MahaVitaran's 22.1 million consumers, 312,000 are from industry and of these 12,000 are high-tension users. MahaVitaran mobilizes nearly Rs 10,000 crore annually from these high tension consumers to cross-subsidize agricultural users in particular. MahaVitaran has sought from the state government Rs 3,800 crore of the total dues worth Rs 8,000 crore from farmers.

R B Goenka, chairman, energy cell of Vidarbha Industries Association told Business Standard, "In current scenario, the tariff has increased to un-sustainable limits. It will become difficult for industries to use such high cost energy for running their Industries and will have to close down because power in neighboring states is much cheaper. Industries in Maharashtra cannot compete with industries in neighboring states."

MahaVitaran official said the discom is giving a rebate of Rs 2.50 per unit during night for industry consumers. However, industry bodies have argued that despite this concession tariff continues to be the highest.

Meanwhile, the state government has taken a serious note and formed a cabinet sub committee led by industries minister and former chief minister Narayan Rane to suggest ways to lower the industry tariff.

Source

Read More...

November 11, 2013

MoP proposes to allow the consumers to get power from the power supplier of their choice...

 

Power to coose electricity suppliers

In a revolutionary step, the union Ministry of Power (MoP) has proposed for the Nagpur city to separate distribution and supply of electricity. If this model is implemented you may be able to choose your power supplier, the one which offers you the most attractive tariff. This model has been successful in United Kingdom (UK) and there are six supply companies that compete with each other in offering best packages to consumers.

The possible future scenario can be understood by an example. At present, the city is supplied power by MSEDCL and SNDL. However, SNDL is only a franchisee of MSEDCL and its tariff is the same. Their area of operations are different. A SNDL consumer does not have the choice of opting for MSEDCL supply and vice-versa.

If the proposed model is implemented MSEDCL will become only the owner of power network in the city. Various power companies like Tata, Reliance, Torrent, etc will use this network to supply power to consumers. A consumer will have the option of choosing any of them. MSEDCL can also supply power but for that state government will have to constitute a separate power supply company - say Maharashtra State Electricity Supply Company Limited (MSESCL) - that will compete with private players.

The supply companies will provide new connections, install their own meters, issue and collect bills. They will attend to billing complaints. But, the power breakdowns will be attended by the distributor MSEDCL.

If the model is seriously implemented it will break the monopoly of state-run discoms which have become extremely inefficient due to lack of competition. Many of them might improve their services like public sector banks did to survive. Due to poor financial health of these discoms power generation companies too are in a bad shape.

Commenting on the draft amendment power expert RB Goenka said while the step was welcome it had several flaws and grey areas. "The draft proposes to continue cross subsidy. This will come in way of offering a competitive tariff. Instead government should make it compulsory for generating stations and supply companies to provide it certain quantum of power at subsidized rates and then supply it to farmers.

"Secondly, the tariff of the suppliers will be determined by electricity regulatory commissions. This is even more illogical. How can suppliers offer competitive tariff if somebody else decides it for them. I am opposing these provisions in my submission to MoP. Unless these provisions are removed the new model won't be successful," he said.

Source

Read More...

Hearing in MERC on the petition filed by vidarbha industries against MSEDCL on billing issue...

 

Petition against MSEDCL

Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC) will on November 13 hear a petition filed by industries against illegal bills issued by MSEDCL in September. Vidarbha Industries Association (VIA) too has filed the petition on behalf of all industrial associations in Vidarbha.

MERC in August had allowed MSEDCL to levy six surcharges from September. However, MSEDCL levied them in August bills itself in violation of Commission's order. In spite of protests by industrialists, MSEDCL did not provide any relief. The surcharges have increased electricity bills by 20%.


The industrialists have contended that while it does not matter to residential and commercial consumers whether they start paying surcharges from August or September, industries had suffered heavy losses. The reason is that industries had fixed the price of their goods on the basis of power tariff prevailing in August. Had they known the power rates would increase by 20% they would have increased price accordingly. However, they had sold their products at lower prices in August but the input cost had increased which caused them losses.

Nineteen industries and VIA have filed similar petition and hence MERC has clubbed them. They have demanded that the Commission should register case against MSEDCL officials under Section 142 & 146 of Electricity Act for violating MERC's directives. An organization or official convicted under these sections can be fined up to Rs 1 lakh.

The industries have also prayed that MSEDCL be directed to issue corrected bill for August 2013 without surcharges. They have also demanded that only three surcharges instead of six should be levied in September and corrected bills for this month should also be issued. All consumers should be refunded excess amount with interest.

This is the first step by industries and consumers to fight high handed behaviour of MSEDCL. They also plan to challenge MERC's order on six surcharges in Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (ATE) and lodge a complaint against MSEDCL in Competition Commission of India for misusing its power in a monopoly situation.

Many industrialists had earlier decided not to pay August bills but this was opposed by textile industries and this form of protest was dropped. Now the industries are concentrating on legal measures and taking up the issue with chief minister Prithviraj Chavan. The industrialists have also joined hands with other consumers to expose MSEDCL and Mahagenco. MSEDCL's inflation of farmers' bills has become a major embarrassment for the distributor while Genco is at pains to explain its extremely high cost of generation.

Source

Read More...

November 2, 2013

Power utility keen to cut residential users' tariff...

 

electricity tariff of Maharashtra

The state power distributor-Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd (MSEDCL)-is keen on exempting residential users from paying renewable energy (RE) charges.

The utility, which supplies power to Thane, Navi Mumbai and parts of the eastern suburbs, wants to impose the levy on "polluting" industrial units. A petition with regard to the RE charges was heard by the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, which in its order this week stated that "the petitioner may raise the issue during the tariff determination of MSEDCL". "Following the regulator's order, we will present a proposal for exempting RE charges and reducing tariff for residential consumers in the aggregate revenue requirement," a MSEDCL spokesperson told TOI. The aggregate revenue requirement for a multi-year tariff plan is likely to be submitted by December after which public hearings will commence.

Industry associations have strongly opposed the proposal. "It is unfair to create a separate category of polluting units. All industries receive a certificate from the pollution control board and industries are already make efforts to minimize effluence," said SL Patil of Thane Belapur Industries Association. and keep it within the permissible limits. Imposition of cost of RE power on industries shall increase their tariff. "It would be great injustice and many industries in Maharashtra will either close down because of unaffordable power or shift to other states,'' he pointed out.

Power expert Ashok Pendse also questioned the state power distributor's rationale.

"We are not buying renewable (non-conventional) energy because of pollution, but it is being promoted because in years to come, the conventional resources such as coal and gas are going to get depleted. It is irrational to impose RE charges on industries," he said. "The tariff for RE sources is very high. The average cost of purchasing renewable energy has increased Rs 3.81 per unit in 2009-10 to Rs 4.32 per unit in 2012-13. Due to the higher cost of RE power purchase, the average cost of MSEDCL also rose from Rs. 3.30 per unit to Rs. 4.25 per unit," a MSEDCL official said.

"This has direct impact on ARR and subsequently affects the overall tariff, specially the tariff of low end common consumers of MSEDCL,'' the official stated. "Since the burden of RE purchase is borne by the common consumers, we want to change the scenario and pass it on to the industries responsible for pollution and climate change,'' he added.

The industries associations are likely to raise objections when the ARR comes up for public hearing, sources said. "However, we are taking the step in the general interest of the low-end consumers, who are burdened with hefty electricity bills,'' a MSEDCL spokesperson added.

MERC has asked Tata Power company to treat all residential consumers, with an average consumption of upto 300 units in the last 12 months, as direct consumers from November 1. This means that consumers in the 11 clusters will be paying less tariff. Tata will have to procure necessary power for these consumers and also create infrastructure and provide customer care facilities in near future.

Source

Read More...

October 31, 2013

Industry miffed as Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission allows higher cross subsidy charge...

 

MERC on Cross subsidy surcharges

In what may be a gain for farmers, but a loss for the manufacturing sector, Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC) has approved a hike in cross subsidy surcharge (CSS) from Rs 1.18-1.60 per unit to Rs 2.30-2.75 a unit respectively.

This has left the industries miffed. CSS is a charge levied from the industry when it buys power from open market rather than the state-owned utility MSEDCL.

It is levied to make good the losses on account of cheap power for agricultural and other consumers. For this reason, MSEDCL charges industry a higher rate but if the industries buy power from sources other than MSEDCL, government does not get the money for funding subsidy. CSS is charged on purchases from open market to bridge the gap.

Vidarbha Industries Association (VIA) has been lobbying hard to do away with the CSS. However, the deputy chief minister Ajit Pawar, who also heads the power ministry, has flatly refused on the grounds that funds were needed for subsiding the farmers and poor consumers. MERC decision to hike the CSS has left the industries disappointed. VIA said that it would appeal the order.

R B Goenka, who represents VIA in MERC, said the order would kill competitiveness of private power players operating in open market. After adding the increased CSS, power from open market becomes almost equal to MSEDCL.

"MSEDCL charges Rs 7.50 per unit on average. With higher CSS, power from open market would be costlier at Rs 7.65 a unit. If the load factor incentive is claimed by a consumer, MSEDCL tariff can be further reduced to around Rs 6.75 a unit," said Goenka.

Goenka claims high power tariff had hit industrial production in state. He is relying on year-on-year change in consumption by high tension users. "The consumption has come down by 2% this year," he said. HT users include commercial establishments, townships as well as industries. According to Goenka's estimates it was likely that the industrial consumption may have gone down by 5% but consumption by commercial establishments and townships increased leading to a net fall of 2%.

 

Source

Read More...

October 1, 2013

Nashik Industrial bodies to move to high court against the recent tariff hike of 25% by MSEDCL...

 

electricity tariff increase MSEDCL

Industrial Corporation of Nashik are planning to move to High Court against the recent power tariff hike of up to 25% by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) and to launch launch awareness drives against the hike among farmers, consumers, traders and entrepreneurs.

The decisions were taken during a joint meeting of office-bearers of Nashik Industries & Manufacturers' Association (NIMA), Ambad Industries and Manufacturers' Association (AIMA), Maharashtra Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Agriculture (MACCIA) and Nashik Industrial Cooperative Estate ( NICE).

According to the NIMA president, the MSEDCL has hiked power tariff in the range of 14-25% without taking industrial associations and consumer forums in confidence. This sudden power hike has been imposed on farmers, consumers and industrialists.

Hence, all the industrial associations across the state have decided to move to HC against the hike.

The written petitions are to be filed in Mumbai, Nagpur and Aurangabad benches of the HC by the electric panel of experts of all the industrial associations.

Currently the effective power tariff for industries in Maharashtra is Rs 10.05 per unit, which is higher than any other state in the country. Power tariff is Rs 3.3 per unit in Goa, Rs 5.75 per unit in Karnataka, Rs 6.5 per unit in Andhra Pradesh, Rs 5.75 per unit in Gujarat, Rs 5.25 per unit in Chhattisgarh and Rs 6.75 per unit in Madhya Pradesh.

 


More literature on this...

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nashik/Industrial-bodies-to-move-HC-against-power-tariff-hike/articleshow/23330584.cms


Read More...

May 8, 2012

Mahagenco to develop 200 MW of Solar Projects by 2015…

Power India found that he Maharashtra State Power Generation Company (Mahagenco) is planning to set up four more solar power plants in the State with a total capacity of about 200 MW by 2015.

 

Current Projects

Mahagenco, currently, is executing a 150 MW solar power project at Sakri town in Dhule district. Work on this project began last May.

 

Proposed Projects

  • Mahagenco is proppsing to set up plants in Beed, Sangli, Parbhani and Osmanabad districts, which have good solar radiation and almost 300 days of sunshine.
  • Mahagenco’s local administration has been ordered to find suitable land parcels for setting up the projects.
Land identification
  • As land acquisition has become a major challenge in Maharashtra, therefore non-cultivable lands are being surveyed for acquisition. Preference would be given to 100 hectare plots, which are fully owned by the government.
  • All the power produced by the plants would be bought by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company (Mahadiscom) without any preconditions.
  • This will also ensure that Mahadiscom meets the mandatory requirement of sourcing power from renewable sources, the official said.
Feasibilty of Solar Projects
  • The rising demand for power and delays in setting up conventional thermal coal plants is pushing the government to look for non-conventional energy resources for power generation.
  • Mahagenco will examine the feasibility of using either thin film or crystalline based photovoltaic technology for the plants.
  • There is a good potential to produce solar power in Maharashtra, as many areas have solar radiation, comparable to those in Rajasthan.
  • However a  good State level solar policy is required, which can encourage private sector to put up solar power plants in Maharashtra such as in Gujarat and Rajasthan.

Last year Sakri project had hit a major hurdle as the State Forest Department had claimed ownership of the project site. However, the State Government settled the issue and construction work has already begun, the official added.

 


More Literature on this topic:


 

 

-----------------------------------

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons license.
Read More...